By about 125,000 BP it is certain that there were prehistoric settlements in Sri Lanka (Deraniyagala 1992:686). The
evidence stems from excavations conducted in coastal deposits near Bundala. Patirajawela yielded a small-flake stone tool
industry from horizons dated to 125,000 to 75,000 BP, while Bundala-Wellegangoda had comparable material from ca. 80,000 BP
2 . These people made tools of quartz (and a few on chert) which are assignable to a Middle Palaeolithic complex (ibid.:252-4,458,688).
Apart from such tools, no other vestiges of their culture have survived the ravages of time and tropical weathering: we do
not know what these people looked like, although it can be guessed that they were early Homo sapiens somewhat akin to anatomically
modern South Asians. Even the sizes of their settlement are not known due to the limited scale of the evaluation excavations;
surface indications are ca. 50 square metres or less per site. That they lived by hunting and gathering is obvious and it
is probable that this conformed to the pattern discernible in the activities of their descendants some 100,000 years later.
We do know, however, that the physical and biotic environments of these early humans, from the Middle Pleistocene onwards,
fluctuated between pluvial and interpluvial episodes (ibid.:178-82,436-40) with corresponding oscillations in animal and food-plant
resources which would have been reflected in shifts in human population densities. It is estimated that during certain pluvial
episodes in South Asia, as at ca. 125,000 BP, the population density in the Dry Zone of northern, eastern and southern Sri
Lanka (for ecozones v. ibid.:app.I) could have ranged between 1.5 and 0.8 individuals per square kilometre, whereas the Wet
Zone in the west would have had densities of 0.1 or less. It has been hypothesised that interpluvials witnessed a narrower
dichotomy in the zonal population densities, the respective estimates being less than 0.3 for the Dry Zone and over 0.1 for
the Wet Zone. These figures are derived from ethnographic sources pertaining to South and Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers.
Given the postulated densities of the food supplies, it is unlikely that large communities in excess of a couple of nuclear
families were the norm, except perhaps along the northern and eastern coasts with their rich resources of marine foods (ibid.:178-82,436-44).
From about 37,000 BP onwards the prehistoric record is very
much more complete. The information stems from a series of cave excavations in the lowland Wet Zone: Fa Hien-lena near Bulathsinhala
(37,000-5,400 BP), Batadomba-lena near Kuruwita (31,000-11,500 BP), Beli-lena at Kitulgala (over 30,000-3,500 BP), Alu-lena
at Attanagoda near Kegalle (10,500 BP)3 . These data are supplemented by those from the open-air site of Bellan-bandi Palassa
near Embilipitiya (6,500 TL BP). The dating is based primarily on radiocarbon assays on charcoal, checked independently against
thermoluminescence dating in the case of Beli-lena. There are over 50 such dates from various contexts at these sites and
the chronological framework may be pronounced secure (ibid:695-701).
Fa Hien-lena has yielded the earliest evidence (at ca. 37,000
BP) of anatomically modern man in South Asia 4 , followed by Batadomba-lena at 31,000 and 18,000, Beli-lena at 16,000, Fa
Hien-lena at 6,900, Bellan-bandi Palassa at 6,500 and Fa Hien-lena again at 4,800 BP. These human remains have been subjected
to detailed physical anthropological study and it has been affirmed that the genetic continuum from at least as early as 18,000
BP at Batadomba-lena to Beli-lena at 16,000 BP to Bellan-bandi Palassa at 6,500 BP to the recent Vaddha aboriginal population
is remarkably pronounced (ibid:486-9; Kennedy et al. 1987; Hawkey 1998; Kennedy 2000; the earlier material from Fa Hien-lena
is too fragmentary for such comparative study). This suggests a backwater in terms of population dynamics. It appears to have
been a remarkably static situation over so long a period, relatively undisturbed by the arrival of new populations with diverse
physical traits. These anatomically modern prehistoric humans in Sri Lanka are referred to as Balangoda Man in popular parlance
(derived from his being responsible for the Mesolithic ’Balangoda Culture’ first defined in sites near Balangoda).
He stood at an estimated height of ca. 174 cm for males and 166 cm for females in certain samples, which is considerable when
compared with present-day populations in Sri Lanka (v. Deraniyagala 1992:330-4). The bones are robust, with thick skull-bones,
prominent brow-ridges, depressed wide noses, heavy jaws and short necks. The teeth are conspicuously large. These traits have
survived in varying degrees among the Vaddas and certain Sinhalese groups, thus pointing to Balangoda Man as a common ancestor.
It needs to be borne in mind, however, that there would have been unimpeded gene-flow between southernmost India and Sri Lanka
(in both directions) from the Palaeolithic onwards, and that future research will probably reveal a whole range of genetic
clusters in the prehistoric populations of this region, which would invalidate the concept of Balangoda Man as a homogeneous
’race’. Meanwhile, Balangoda Man continues to be a useful working concept, referring to the island’s late
Quaternary humans. He appears to have settled in practically very nook and corner of Sri Lanka ranging from the damp and cold
High Plains such as Maha-eliya (Horton Plains) to the arid lowlands of Mannar and Vilpattu, to the steamy equatorial rainforests
of Sabaragamuwa. The camps were invariably small, rarely exceeding 50sq.m in area, thus suggesting occupation by not more
than a couple of nuclear families at most (id. 1992:351). This life-style could not have been too different from that described
for the Vaddas of Sri Lanka, the Kadar, Malapantaram and Chenchus of India, the Andaman Islanders and the Semang of Malaysia
(ibid.:412,451-7). They would have been moving from place to place on an annual cycle of foraging for food. The well preserved
evidence from the caves and Bellan-bandi Palassa indicates that a very wide range of food-plants and animals were exploited.
Among the former, canarium nuts, wild breadfruit and wild bananas are prominent. It is probable that dioscorea yams, such
as Dioscorea spicata, D. pentaphylla and D. oppositifolia were staples in the diet, as they were among South Asian hunters
and gatherers in recent times. It appears as if every conceivable type of animal had been eaten, ranging from elephants to
snakes, rats, snails and small fish (ibid.:451-2). This diet would have been well balanced as attested by the robusticity
of the human skeletal remains. The degeneration of bone that accompanies a specialised starchy diet and a sedentary life style
had yet to set in.
The tool kit of Balangoda Man is distinguished by the occurrence
of geometric microliths, comprising small (less than 4 cm long) flakes of quartz and (rarely) chert fashioned into stylised
lunate, triangular and trapezoidal forms (ibid:266-70,688-94). Such geometric microliths have traditionally been considered
the hallmark of the Mesolithic period as first defined in Europe. The earliest dates for the geometric microlithic tradition
in Europe are around 12,000 BP. Hence it came as a surprise when such tools were found as early as 31,000 BP at Batadomba-lena,
28,000 BP at two coastal sites in Bundala and over 30,000 BP at Beli-lena. Sri Lanka has yielded evidence of this sophisticated
technological phase over 19,000 years earlier than in Europe. However this apparent anomaly has been resolved by the discovery
of geometric microliths in various parts of Africa, such as Zaire and southern Africa, from contexts in excess of 27,000 BP,
thereby suggesting that Europe was late in manifesting this techno-tradition due to as yet undefined reasons.
Apart from stone tools, artefacts of bone and antler are quite
prolific from 31,000 BP onwards, notably small bone points (ibid.:278-81). Beads of shell have also been discovered from these
early contexts and the occurrence of marine shells at inland sites such as Batadomba-lena points to an extensive network of
contacts between the coast and the hinterland. There is evidence from Beli-lena that salt had been brought in from the coast
at a date in excess of 30,000 BP (ibid.:326).
Sri Lanka has yet to produce unequivocal evidence of Stone Age
art. The cave art observed in various parts of the Dry Zone are the works of Vaddas, as demonstrated by ethnographers, although
a certain proportion of it could conceivably be prehistoric (ibid.:465). Similarly there is little evidence of manifestations
of ritual. There are, however, clear indications that the norm was for Balangoda Man to inter his dead irrespective of age
or sex as secondary burials within his camp floors, having selected certain bones for this purpose. At Ravanalla cave and
Fa Hien-lena red ochre had been ceremonially smeared on the bones. Both these practices have been matched by the mortuary
customs of the Andaman Islanders, but not by those of the Vaddas. It is possible that the latter, through a process of cultural
retrogression, ceased to practise the more elaborate mortuary customs of their ancestors (ibid.:465-7,696).
* * * * * The periodisation of Sri Lanka’s main technological
episodes comprises the Middle Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, protohistoric Early Iron Age, Early Historic, Middle Historic, Late
Historic and the Modern periods. What concerns the present section is the interface between the Mesolithic and Early Iron
The termination of the Mesolithic and the inception of the Early
Iron Age in Sri Lanka has yet to be delineated with any clarity, due primarily to the lack of a single context with evidence
of the transition between the two periods: none of the sites excavated so far has been able to present a chronological continuum
from pre- to protohistory. In the case of caves the proto- and Early Historic strata have invariably been disturbed by guano
diggers, whereas with open-air sites the selection of loci for settlement does not appear to have coincided (owing to different
subsistence strategies) during the prehistoric and subsequent periods repectively.
There is palynological (pollen) evidence from the Horton Plains
for herding (?Bos indicus) and the incipient management of barley and oats by >15,000 BC and by herding and the farming
of barley and oats by 8,000 BC (Premathilake 2000). Then there is Doravak-lena shelter which is said to have yielded a geometric
microlithic industry in association with what appears to be a cereal and a crude red pottery by 5,300 BC and Black and Red
Ware (BRW) by 3,100 BC (Wiyeyapala in Deraniyagala ip:34, final report pends.). There is also Mantai where a geometric microlithic
horizon dated to ca. 1,800 BC was found associated with a few pieces of slag, which could indicate the knowledge of copper-working
as manifested in southern India by ca. 2,000 BC 5 . At all three sites, the indications are that settlements suggestive of
herding/farming dominating the subsistence strategy are not in evidence. Assuming that the term ’protohistoric’
applies only when over half the nutrient intake is derived from food production (ie, herding/farming) these sites are being
assigned to the prehistoric period. But they do represent the transition from prehistory to protohistory in Sri Lanka. It
was of considerable duration, ca. 13,000 years, and constitutes a field of research into what is still uncharted terrain.
It is probable that from at least as early as 14,000 BC up to ca. 1,000 BC, different subsistence strategies were being employed
comtemporaneously, according to the ecological niche being exploited. These strategies could have ranged from one based 100
per cent on hunting and gathering to those with a certain degree of herding/farming with hunting and gathering being still
The new evidence from the Horton Plains is of the greatest significance
(Premathilake 2000). Ghar-i-Mar and Aq Kupruk in Afghanistan and Mehrgarh in Pakistan are known to have had a Neolithic subsistence
strategy by 7,000-6,000 BC. There is tentative evidence of herding in northern Rajasthan by 7,000 BC, of rice and pottery
at Koldihwa, U.P. in India by 5,000 BC, and perhaps cereal management/farming in the Nilgiri Hills of South India by 8,000
BC (Gupta and Prasad 1985 cited in Premathilake 2000).
It was proposed but not established that Sri Lanka could have
constituted yet another ‘hearth’ for the domestication of plants (Deraniyagala 1988; 1992:322,448). And so indeed
it has proved to be, comparable to the incipient plant domestication of the Natufian in Syria, Lebanon and Israel (ca. 10,000-8,000
BC) and incipient herding at Zawi Chemi Shanidar and Shanidar in the Zagros and Kurdish hills of Iraq (ca. 9,000 BC). The
search for Neolithic/Chalcolithic settlements in Sri Lanka needs to focus on finding faunal or plant domesticates, pottery,
or evidence of copper-alloy working, in contexts predating the Early Iron Age. It is probable that these would be found in
association with geometric microliths which would otherwise be assigned to the Mesolithic. If is noteworthy that the Neolithic/Chalcolithic
stone artefacts in peninsular India display microlithic (Mesolithic) vis à vis blade (Neolithic/Chalcolithic) traits progressively
as one moves southwards (ibid.:285-6,297; Allchin and Allchin 1974; 1974a).
EARLY IRON AGE
The protohistoric Early Iron Age appears to have established
itself in South India by at least as early as 1,200 BC, if not earlier (Possehl 1990; Deraniyagala 1992:734). The earliest
manifestation of this in Sri Lanka is radiocarbon dated to ca. 1000-800 BC at Anuradhapura and Aligala shelter in Sigiriya
(Deraniyagala 1992:709-29; Karunaratne and Adikari 1994:58; Mogren 1994:39; the Anuradhapura dating is now corroborated by
Coningham 1999). It is very likely that further investigations will push back the Sri Lankan lower boundary to match that
of South India.
The settlement at Anuradhapura exceeded 10 hectares in extent
by ca. 800 BC, and it was at least 50 ha by ca. 700-600 BC and thus already a ’town’ (Deraniyagala 1992:Addendum
I; cf. Allchin 1989:3). So far no other settlements of the Early Iron Age have been located in Sri Lanka (with the exception
of the very small-scale deposit within the rock-shelter at Aligala). Potential sites are Kandarodai, Matota (Mantai), Kelaniya
and Tissamaharama; but the evidence has yet to surface (Deraniyagala 1992:730-2,735).
The ’Megalithic’ Early Iron Age mortuary complex
of Sri Lanka (Seneviratne 1984) is akin to that of peninsular India. It falls primarily, within the protohistoric period,
as indicated by its radiocarbon age of 750-400 BC at the only site to have been dated, Ibbankatuwa (v. Bandaranayake and Kilian
in Deraniyagala 1992:734). The place of this mortuary trait within the overall Early Iron Age culture in Sri Lanka is as yet
indeterminate. It is noteworthy that these cemeteries do not have contemporaneous settlements associated with them, for instance
at Ibbankatuwa (Karunaratne 1994). In India this situation prevails at most localities (Deo 1985 cited in Kennedy 2000:356).
Conversely, the Early Iron Age settlement at Anuradhapura does not have a Megalithic cemetery to which it can even remotely
be linked. The Megalithic mortuary complex could possibly have been associated with just a special group of people, such as
pastoralists, on the periphery of those who occupied Anuradhapura (cf. Leshnik 1974). What this signifies is that the Megalithic
mortuary trait is but a discrete facet of the protohistoric Early Iron Age culture complex of India which had its distribution
from the Gangetic valley down to Sri Lanka with regional variations. Hence it is misleading to refer to a Megalithic culture,
as several scholars are apt to, since this mortuary trait is not necessarily a concomitant of the Early Iron Age of peninsular
India or Sri Lanka.
Similarly, the BRW ceramic tradition, which characterises much
of the subcontinent’s Early Iron Age (except in the northwest) is not confined to the Megalithic mortuary facies in
peninsular India, a point that is frequently overlooked. There is a tendency to equate BRW with the Megalithic complex on
a one-to-one basis, thereby distorting the basis of interpretations from the outset. It is important, therefore, that the
nature of this interrelationship between (a) the total Early Iron Age complex of the sub-continent, (b) its BRW ceramic complex
and (c) the Megalithic cemetery complex in southern India and Sri Lanka be kept clearly in mind, so as to avoid confusion
in interpreting the archaeological record (Deraniyagala 1992:734). The Sri Lankan data need to be interpreted against the
backdrop of the total sub-continental Early Iron Age, since medium- to long-range cultural diffusion appears to have been
The biological anthropology of Early Iron Age man in Sri Lanka
is distinct from that of Balangoda Man, although the evidence from the only Megalithic site to have been assayed, Pomparippu,
suggests a certain degree of miscegenation 6 . This could have occurred considerably prior to 500 BC (and after Bellan-bandi
Palassa at ca. 4,500 BC) (Kennedy in Begley et al. 1981; Deraniyagala 1992:736; Hawkey 1998). What attracted these people
who intruded on the scene at this early date? It is probable that the agricultural potential of Sri Lanka, notably its abundant
supplies of water, with iron technology to subjugate the dense equatorial rainforest and heavy soils, was a major factor.
Other attractions could have been the pearl banks in the northwest of the island (for Early Historic v. Mahroof 1992:110),
the major copper ore source at Seruvila (Seneviratne 1994) and the island's location as an entrepôt for long-distance trade
between Southeast Asia and West Asia 7 . Thereafter, Sri Lanka's attraction for settlers from further afield than South India
appears to have gained rapidly. This swell coincided with the so-called Second Urbanisation of the Indo-Gangetic Plain (v.
Allchin 1995). As mentioned earlier, Anuradhapura was at least 10 ha in extent by ca. 900 BC (perhaps much more). and by 700-500
BC it exceeded 50 ha. The phenomenon of the Indian Second Urbanisation would appear to have manifested itself unexpectedly
early in Sri Lanka, either through rapid stimulus diffusion, or convergent evolution due to a stimulus from further afield
such as long-distance trade, or (more likely) a combination of both.
TRANSITION TO THE HISTORICAL PERIOD
The Early Iron Age of Sri Lanka, at ca. 1000-500 BC, is referred
to as protohistoric since there is no evidence of writing in this period. At ca. 600-500 BC, the first appearance of writing
(in Brahmi almost identical to the Asokan script some 200 years later) heralds the commencement of the Early Historic period
(Deraniyagala 1992:739-5; Coningham 1999; Deraniyagala and Abeyratne ip). This writing, radiocarbon dated on charcoal from
three locations in the Citadel of Anuradhapura and checked by thermoluminescence dating, is inscribed on potsherds signifying
ownership. Among the names was Anuradh..., which, coincidentally or otherwise, is stated in the ancient chronicles to have
been the name of a minister of prince Vijaya, the purported 'founder' leader of the Sinhalese, at ca. 500 BC. The new chronology
for the beginnings of writing has thus revolutionised our concept of the lower boundary of the historical period of South
Asia (for revised periodisation v. Deraniyagala 1992:714). It has pushed it back by at least two centuries ) into the times
of the Buddha. Coeval with the first appearance of writing at Anuradhapura is the rise of new pottery forms (such as Early
Historic BRW) and wares (eg, a medium-fine grey ware, possibly a North Indian import), red glass beads and what appear to
be writing styli made of bone (Deraniyagala 1992:714)8 . One suspects a pan-India wave of cultural impulses that manifested
itself in these material transformations. It is possible that some long-distance migrations, as evinced in the legend of Prince
Vijaya’s arrival in Sri Lanka from North India, were concomitant to this phenomenon.
The earliest (600-500 BC) inscriptions on pottery at Anuradhapura,
whenever adequately complete to be linguistically diagnostic, are in Indo-Aryan Prakrit. This situation is repeated in the
earliest inscription found in Megalithic Kodumanal, and possibly in the lowermost levels of Arikamedu as well, in South India
(ibid.:745-6; Casal 1949; Rajan 1990). So far, none of them are in Dravidian. If appears to corroborate the view that Indo-Aryan
was pre-dominant from at least as early as 500 BC in Sri Lanka, as affirmed in the chronicles concerning an Aryan impulse
associated with Vijaya. The views of Parpola (1984; 1988; v. Deraniyagala 1992:749-8) are relevant in this regard. They are
bold and provocative, and they merit serious consideration. He postulates long-distance southward migrations of ruling Indo-Aryan
elites at ca. 500 BC and argues his case well.
The prime mover for these impulses is difficult to isolate.
The urban centres of the Ganges plains could well have constituted the nodes from which they went out, centrifugally, to be
developed in the periphery and returned centripetally to these original nodes as a feedback phenomenon, thus creating a relatively
closed interactive system. On the other hand, one cannot discount the possibility of inputs at the same time from West Asia,
the Mediterranean and China. It is probable that this latter aspect has been greatly underestimated. The idea of devising
the Brahmi script might have arisen through contact with Semitic trading scripts from West Asia (Deraniyagala 1992:744; note
that long-distance trade could have existed during the protohistoric Early Iron Age extending into Southeast Asia and West
Asia). Whatever the mechanism for the onset of urbanism in Sri Lanka, by 500 BC it was ready to accelerate into the Early
In the time of Emperor Asoka in the third century BC, the city
of Anuradhapura was nearly 100 ha in extent (ibid.:712-3), making it (on present estimates) the tenth largest city in India/Sri
Lanka at that time and the largest south of Ujjain in northern India (Allchin 1989:3,12). Buddhism had by then taken root
as the formal belief system of the island, coinage introduced and technologically the concept of irrigated agriculture, probably
introduced during the Early Iron Age, developed into sophisticated and large-scale systems which served as the economic foundation
of the correspondingly complex settlement configurations of the Early Historic period.
- 1. Thermoluminescence (TL) date (M. Abeyratne 2000:pers:
- 2. TL and Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dates
(M. Abeyratne 2000:pers. comm.; Oxford Archaeological Laboratory 2000:pers. comm.).
- 3. These are radiocarbon dates (Deraniyagala 2001). Those
between 10,000 and 20,000 14 C BP have been calibrated by Beta Analytic Inc. using data base of INTCAL 98 Calibrations
- Stuiver, M. and H. van der Plicht 1998- Editorial comment.
- Stuiver, M. et al. 1998- INTCAL 98 radiocarbon age calibaration
- Talma, A.S. and J.C. Vogel 1993- A simplified approach to
calibrating 14 C dates. Radiocarbon 35(2):317-22.
- The dates in excess of 20,000 14 C BP are being estimated
by adding 4000 years to the radiocarbon age, by compairing with the calibrated ages for the dates immediately preceding 20,000
14 C BP.
- 4. Niah Cave in Borneo at ca. 40,000 14 C BP has produced
the (somewhat insecure) earliest date for Asia. Sri Lankan evidence has been used to support the view that anatomically modern
humans originated in South/Southeast Asia and not in Africa (Hawkey 1998).
- 5. The slag at Mantai, however, could have intruded into
the sample from this otherwise carefully excavated context, perhaps through incorrect labelling. No pottery was found in association.
Further sampling is required to clarify these points. It is now known that the only major source of copper ore south of Madhya
Pradesh in central India is located at Seruvila (the ancient Tambapittha) in eastern Sri Lanka (Seneviratne 1984; 1994). It
is very likely that this was known to the Chalcolithic peoples of India and that Sri Lanka exploited this resource. Mantai
could well have been a port for shipping copper to India.
- Despite the occurrence of copper ores in Sri Lanka, it appears
as if copper alloy technology as found in the Chalcolithic of peninsular India (ca. 1,800-1,200 BC) was not adopted significantly
in Sri Lanka due to the relative inefficiency of this technology as applied to the island’s agricultural milieu.
- 6. Dental morphological analyses have established that the
Pomparippu humans were ancestral to the Sinhalese, vis à vis the Tamils of northern Sri Lanka (Hawkey 1998).
- 7. Black pepper in pharaonic Egypt of the 2 nd millennium
BC could only have come from Kerala, Sri Lanka or Southeast Asia.
- 8. Similar bone ’styli’ have been found in the
Painted Grey Ware levels of Hastinapura and the pre-NBPW levels of Ujjain and Nagda (Banerjee 1965:204-8), thus indirectly
corroborating the dating of the script in Anuradhapura.
- References to Literature
- Allchin, F.R.
- 1989 - City and state formation in early historic South
Asia. South Asian Studies 5:1-16.
- 1995 - The archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: part
II. Cambridge University Press.
- Allchin, F.R. and B. Allchin
- 1974 - The relationship of Neolithic and late settled communities
with those of Late Stone Age hunters and gatherers in peninsular India. In Sharma and Jha ed. (1974:45-66).
- 1974a - Some new thoughts on Indian cattle. In van Lohuizen-de
Leeuw and Ubaghs ed. (1974:71-7).
- Bandaranayake, S. and M. Mogren ed.
- 1994 - Further studies in the settlement archaeology of
the Sigiriya-Dambulla region. Sri Lanka: University of Kelaniya, Postgraduate Institute of Archaeology.
- Banerjee, N.R. 1965 - The Iron Age in India. New Delhi:
- Begley, V., J.R. Lukacs and K.A.R. Kennedy 1981 - Excavations
of Iron Age burials at Pomparippu. Ancient Ceylon 4:51-132.
- Casal, J.M. 1949 - Fouilles de Virampatnam-Arikamedu. Paris:
- Coningham, R.A.E. 1999 - The British Sri Lanka excavations
at Anuradhapura Salgahawatta 2, volume 1: the site.Society for South Asian Studies monograph 3, BAR international series 824.
- Deraniyagala, S.U. 1988 - The prehistory of Sri Lanka: an
ecological perspective, 1 st ed. Harvard University, Anthropology Department: Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan: University Microfilms,
Ann Arbor publication.
- 1992 - The prehistory of Sri Lanka: an ecological perspective.
Colombo: Archaeological Department memoir 8.
- 2001 - The prehistory of Sri Lanka: addendum I; the prehistoric
chronology of Sri Lanka. http: //www. the - prehistory - of - sri - lanka. de
- In press - Administration report of the Director-General
of Archaeology for the year 1992. Colombo: Archaeological Department.
- Deraniyagala, S.U. and M. Abeyratne. In press - Radiocarbon
chronology of Iron Age and Early Historic Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka: a revised age estimate. In Taddei (ip).
- Hawkey, D.T. 1998 - Out of Asia: dental evidence for affinities
and microevolution of early populations from India/Sri Lanka. Arizona State University: Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan: University
Microfilms, Ann Arbor, publication no. DA-9837698.
- Karunaratne, P. 1994 - A brief report on the excavation
at Ibbankatuva, a proto- and Early Historic settlement site. In Bandaranayake and Mogren (1994:105-12).
- Karunaratne, P. and G. Adikari 1994 - Excavations at Aligala
prehistoric site. In Bandaranayake and Mogren (1994:55-64).
- Kennedy, K.A.R. 2000 - God-apes and fossil men: palaeoanthropology
in South Asia. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
- Kennedy, K.A.R., S.U. Deraniyagala, W.J. Roertjen, J. Chiment
and T. Disotell 1987 - Upper Pleistocene fossil hominids from Sri Lanka. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 72:441-61.
- Kenoyer, J.M. ed. 1994 - From Sumer to Meluhha: contributions
to the archaeology of South and West Asia in memory of George F. Dales, jr. Wisconsin Archaeological Reports 3.
- Leshnik, L.S. 1974 - South Indian ’Megalithic’
burials: the Pandukal Complex. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.
- Mahroof, M.M.M. 1992 - Pearls in Sri Lankan history. South
Asian Studies 8:109-14.
- Mogren, M. 1994 - Objectives, methods, constraints and perspectives.
In Bandaranayake and Mogren (1994:23-42).
- Parpola, A. 1984 - On the Jaiminiya and Vadhula traditions
of South India and the Pandu/Pandava problem. Studio Orientalia 55:429-68. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society. 1988 - The
coming of the Aryans to Iran and India and the cultural and ethnic identity of the Dasas. Studio Orientalia 64:195-302.
- Possehl, G. 1990 - Scientific dates for South Asian Archaeology.
University Pennsylvania: University Museum. Asian Section, 1.
- Premathilake, T.R. 2000 - Late Quaternary environmental
history of the Horton Plains, central Sri Lanka. Stockholm University: Department of Quaternary Research. Unpublished Ph.D.
- Rajan, K. 1990 - New light on the Megalithic culture of
the Kongu region, Tamil Nadu. Man and Environment 15(1):93-102.
- Seneviratne, S. 1984 - The archaeology of the Megalithic
Black and Red Ware Complex in Sri Lanka. Ancient Ceylon 5:237-307. 1994 - The ecology and archaeology of the Seruwila copper-magnetite
prospect, northeast Sri Lanka.
- In Kenoyer ed. (1994:261-80).
- Sharma, R. S. and V. Jha ed. 1974 - Indian society: probings
in memory of D.D. Kosambi. N. Delhi.
- Taddei, M. ed. In press - South Asian Archaeology, 1997.
- van Lohuizen-de Leeuw J.T. and J.M.M. Ubaghs ed. 1974 -
South Asian Archaeology, 1973. Brill. Submitted August 2001